|
|
Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corp. v. James, 272 U.S. 701 (1927)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corp. v. James, 272 U.S. 701 (1927)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 272 U.S. 693, click here.
Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corporation v. James No. ___, Original Motion submitted October 25, 1926 Denied January 3, 1927 272 U.S. 701
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
A PETITION FOR MANDAMUS
Syllabus
1. In the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, under Jud. Code § 234, and in fulfillment of its power under Rev.Stats. § 917 to regulate the equity practice, this Court has discretion to issue the writ directly to the district court in a case of which it has ultimate power to review the merits, for the purpose of inquiring into and correcting a practice of assigning all patent causes to a master, adopted by the district judges in alleged disconformity to the Equity Rules. P. 705.
2. Under Equity Rules 46 and 59, trials are, generally, to be oral, in open court, and references to a master exceptional, and this applies to patent cases. P. 706.
3. District courts must exercise a discretion in reference to the order of business, and congestion of the calendar with many cases, including a large number of criminal cases, ahead of the patent cases may furnish cause for referring the patent cases to a master. P. 707.
Leave to file denied.
Original application for leave to file a petition for mandamus directed to one of the district judges of the Southern District of California.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corp. v. James, 272 U.S. 701 (1927) in 272 U.S. 701 272 U.S. 702. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FNULXC7PB57N65B.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corp. v. James, 272 U.S. 701 (1927), in 272 U.S. 701, page 272 U.S. 702. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FNULXC7PB57N65B.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corp. v. James, 272 U.S. 701 (1927). cited in 1927, 272 U.S. 701, pp.272 U.S. 702. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FNULXC7PB57N65B.
|