|
United States v. American Can Co., 280 U.S. 412 (1930)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. American Can Co., 280 U.S. 412 (1930)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 280 U.S. 409, click here.
United States v. American Can Company Nos. 128 , 129 , 130 Argued January 21, 1930 Decided February 24, 1930 280 U.S. 412
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. The Act of September 8, 1916, § 13, par. (d), in providing that a corporation which keeps its accounts upon any basis other than that of actual receipts and disbursements may, subject to regulations, make its income return upon the basis of its accounts unless that basis does not clearly reflect the income, refers to the general bookkeeping system followed by the taxpayer, and not to the accuracy or propriety of mere individual items or entries upon the books. P. 419.
2. Therefore, where the books of corporations, kept upon the accrual basis, and returns upon that basis, contained excessive inventory valuations, and thereby indicated net incomes much too small, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue properly corrected the erroneous valuations and made reassessments upon the returns as so modified. His rejection of the errors was not a rejection of the basis upon which the returns were made, and did not make it necessary that the reassessment be based on actual receipts and disbursements. Id., 31 F.2d 730 reversed.
Certiorari, post, p. 538, to review judgments of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed recoveries in the district court, 20 F.2d 970, in actions against the United States for moneys collected as income and excess profits taxes. See also Aluminum Castings Co. v. Routzahn, 31 F.2d 669.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. American Can Co., 280 U.S. 412 (1930) in 280 U.S. 412 280 U.S. 413–280 U.S. 415. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FMDNVYU8JFTZ7BW.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. American Can Co., 280 U.S. 412 (1930), in 280 U.S. 412, pp. 280 U.S. 413–280 U.S. 415. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FMDNVYU8JFTZ7BW.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. American Can Co., 280 U.S. 412 (1930). cited in 1930, 280 U.S. 412, pp.280 U.S. 413–280 U.S. 415. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FMDNVYU8JFTZ7BW.
|