Hunt v. United States, 278 U.S. 96 (1928)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hunt v. United States, 278 U.S. 96 (1928)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 278 U.S. 92, click here.
Hunt v. United States No. 44 Argued October 23, 1928 Decided November 19, 1928 278 U.S. 96
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Syllabus
1. When the numbers of wild deer on a national forest and game preserve have increased to such excess that, by overbrowsing upon and killing young trees, bushes, and forage plants. they cause great injury to the land, it is within the power of the United States to cause their numbers to be reduced by killing. and their carcasses to be shipped outside the limits of such reserves. P. 100.
2. This power spring from the federal ownership of the lands affected, and is independent of the game law of the state in which they are situate. Id.
3. A direction for such killing and shipment, given by the Secretary of Agriculture, was within the authority conferred upon him by Act of Congress. Id.
4. Carcasses and parts of the deer so killed should be marked before being taken from the reserves to show that the deer were killed there under authority of the Secretary of Agriculture. P. 101.
19 F.2d 634 modified and affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of permanent injunction granted by the district court after a final hearing by three judges in a suit brought by the United States. The decree enjoined the Governor, the Game Warden, a county attorney, and a sheriff of the State of Arizona from arresting or prosecuting officers and agents of the United States under the game law, for or on account of the killing, possession, and transportation of deer under an order made by the Secretary of Agriculture to protect a National Forest and Game Preserve from the destructive effects of overbrowsing.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hunt v. United States, 278 U.S. 96 (1928) in 278 U.S. 96 278 U.S. 99. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FDDE3B9UGQSI2W4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hunt v. United States, 278 U.S. 96 (1928), in 278 U.S. 96, page 278 U.S. 99. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FDDE3B9UGQSI2W4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hunt v. United States, 278 U.S. 96 (1928). cited in 1928, 278 U.S. 96, pp.278 U.S. 99. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FDDE3B9UGQSI2W4.
|