|
Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth, 275 U.S. 471 (1928)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth, 275 U.S. 471 (1928)
Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth No. 126 Argued December 6, 7, 1927 Decided January 3, 1928 275 U.S. 471
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. Plaintiff contracted to furnish defendant a specified quantity of lumber, knowing that it was to be used by defendant in building boats but not that they were being built under a contract between the defendant and the Fleet Corporation. Afterwards, the Fleet Corporation, acting under Executive Orders and the Act of June 15, 1917, cancelled its contract, notifying defendant to make no further commitments or expenditures, and defendant, without acting or purporting to act under authority of the Corporation, stopped deliveries of lumber by the plaintiff.
Held:
(1) That the damages recoverable by the plaintiff from the defendant, were not measured as where "just compensation" is claimed from the United States under the statute for cancellation of the government’s own contracts, but included anticipated profits. P. 473.
(2) Plaintiff’s rights under its own contract were not dependent on the continued existence of defendant’s contract with the Fleet Corporation. P. 474.
2. Appellate review in this case, where a jury was waived in writing, held limited to the sufficiency of the facts specially found to support the judgment and to rulings excepted to and presented by bill of exceptions. P. 474.
13 F.2d 581 reversed.
Certiorari, 273 U.S. 684, to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed a judgment, 6 F.2d 471, not including anticipated profits, recovered by the petitioner in an action brought against McLouth and revived against his administrator.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth, 275 U.S. 471 (1928) in 275 U.S. 471 275 U.S. 472. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FAR8PFR8WWKGGTF.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth, 275 U.S. 471 (1928), in 275 U.S. 471, page 275 U.S. 472. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FAR8PFR8WWKGGTF.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth, 275 U.S. 471 (1928). cited in 1928, 275 U.S. 471, pp.275 U.S. 472. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FAR8PFR8WWKGGTF.
|