|
Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 385 (1930)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 385 (1930)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 281 U.S. 379, click here.
Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States No. 389 Argued April 21, 22, 1930 Decided May 5, 1930 281 U.S. 385
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
A telephone company, while under a standing written contract, made with the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Act of June 17, 1910, to furnish telephone equipment and service to the War Department, installed in a building especially constructed for it by the government, an unusually large and very expensive switchboard to meet the growing needs of the Department during the World War, and, after the need was over and the switchboard had been removed, it sued under the Dent Act to recover the cost of installation less salvage.
Held, upon the facts as found below:
1. That the switchboard was covered by the written contract, and that the conduct of the parties following installation was consistent with this view. P. 386.
2. That a contract for extra pay was not to be implied either (a) from claims addressed to officials of the Department having no authority to bind the government and not assented to by them or known to their superiors, or (b) from the fact that the plans for the special building, showing the switchboard and equipment proposed, were submitted to the Secretary of War; or (c) from the fact that the government had continued to use the switchboard after the claims were made. P. 388.
68 Ct.Cls. 273 affirmed.
Certiorari, 280 U.S. 548, to review a judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing a petition to recover additional compensation upon a contract said to be implied in fact.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 385 (1930) in 281 U.S. 385 281 U.S. 386. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=F9E85SH1EP5M5A4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 385 (1930), in 281 U.S. 385, page 281 U.S. 386. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=F9E85SH1EP5M5A4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 385 (1930). cited in 1930, 281 U.S. 385, pp.281 U.S. 386. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=F9E85SH1EP5M5A4.
|