|
|
Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985)
Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Authority No. 82-1913 Argued March 19, 1984 Reargued October 1, 1984 Decided February 19, 1985 * 469 U.S. 528
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Syllabus
Appellee San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (SAMTA) is a public mass transit authority that is the major provider of transportation in the San Antonio, Tex., metropolitan area. It has received substantial federal financial assistance under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964. In 1979, the Wage and Hour Administration of the Department of Labor issued an opinion that SAMTA’s operations are not immune from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) under National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833, in which it was held that the Commerce Clause does not empower Congress to enforce such requirements against the States "in areas of traditional governmental functions." Id. at 852. SAMTA then filed an action in Federal District Court, seeking declaratory relief. Entering judgment for SAMTA, the District Court held that municipal ownership and operation of a mass transit system is a traditional governmental function, and thus, under National League of Cities, is exempt from the obligations imposed by the FLSA.
Held: In affording SAMTA employees the protection of the wage and hour provisions of the FLSA, Congress contravened no affirmative limit on its power under the Commerce Clause. Pp. 537-557.
(a) The attempt to draw the boundaries of state regulatory immunity in terms of "traditional governmental functions" is not only unworkable but is also inconsistent with established principles of federalism and, indeed, with those very federalism principles on which National League of Cities purported to rest. That case, accordingly, is overruled. Pp. 537-547.
(b) There is nothing in the overtime and minimum wage requirements of the FLSA, as applied to SAMTA, that is destructive of state sovereignty or violative of any constitutional provision. The States’ continued role in the federal system is primarily guaranteed not by any externally imposed limits on the commerce power, but by the structure of the Federal Government itself. In these cases, the political process effectively protected that role. Pp. 547-555.
557 F.Supp. 445, reversed and remanded.
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BRENNAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and STEVENS, JJ., joined. POWELL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BURGER, C.J., and REHNQUIST and O’CONNOR, JJ., joined, post, p. 557. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 579. O’CONNOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined, post, p. 580.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985) in 469 U.S. 528 469 U.S. 529–469 U.S. 530. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EVTVW1UNYTIIG4B.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985), in 469 U.S. 528, pp. 469 U.S. 529–469 U.S. 530. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EVTVW1UNYTIIG4B.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985). cited in 1985, 469 U.S. 528, pp.469 U.S. 529–469 U.S. 530. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EVTVW1UNYTIIG4B.
|