|
|
Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 245 U.S. 54, click here.
Buchanan v. Warley No. 33 Argued April 10, 11, 1916 Restored to docket for reargument April 17, 1916 Reargued April 27, 1917 Decided November 5, 1917 245 U.S. 60
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
A city ordinance which forbids colored persons to occupy houses in blocks where the greater number of houses are occupied by white persons in practical effect prevents the sale of lots in such blocks to colored persons, and is unconstitutional. A white owner who has made an otherwise valid and enforceable contract to convey such a lot to a colored person for the erection of a house upon it for occupancy by the vendee is deprived, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, of an essential element of his property -- the right to dispose of it to a constitutionally qualified purchaser -- and may attack the prohibition under the Fourteenth Amendment in a suit for specific performance of the contract against the vendee.
A city ordinance forbidding colored persons from occupying houses as residences, or places of abode or public assembly, on blocks where the majority of the houses are occupied by white persons for those purposes, and in like manner forbidding white persons when the conditions as to occupancy are reversed, and which bases the interdiction upon color. and nothing more, passes the legitimate bounds of police power, and invades the civil right to acquire, enjoy and use property, which is guaranteed in equal measure to all citizens, white or colored, by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Such a prohibition cannot be sustained upon the grounds that, through race segregation, it serves to diminish miscegenation and promotes the public peace by averting race hostility and conflict, or that it prevents deterioration in value of property owned and occupied by white people; nor does the fact that, upon its face, it applies impartially to both races relieve it from the vice of discrimination or obviate the objection that it deprives of property without due process of law. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, and Berea College Case, 211 U.S. 45, distinguished.
165 Kentucky, 559, reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917) in 245 U.S. 60 245 U.S. 61–245 U.S. 69. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ERZCFAA8EFIT1Q9.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917), in 245 U.S. 60, pp. 245 U.S. 61–245 U.S. 69. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ERZCFAA8EFIT1Q9.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917). cited in 1917, 245 U.S. 60, pp.245 U.S. 61–245 U.S. 69. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ERZCFAA8EFIT1Q9.
|