Stilson v. United States, 250 U.S. 583 (1919)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Stilson v. United States, 250 U.S. 583 (1919)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 250 U.S. 577, click here.
Stilson v. United States Nos. 264 , 265 Argued October 20. 21, 1919 Decided November 10, 1919 250 U.S. 583
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Syllabus
The denial of a severance in a criminal case is within the discretion of the judge. P. 585.
The Constitution does not require Congress to grant peremptory challenges to defendants in criminal cases, and the longstanding provision of law (now in Jud.Code, § 287) that all of several defendants shall be treated as one for the purposes of such challenges does not infringe the right to an impartial jury guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id.
In a prosecution for conspiracy to violate the Espionage and Selective Service Acts, where the jury were in substance instructed to consider certain publications uttered by the defendants and determine from them, considered with all the other evidence, whether they amounted to violations, held that related portion of the charge, on their right to call upon their general knowledge and information, were not objectionable. P. 587.
The district judge is not required to analyze and discuss the details of the evidence, particularly when not requested to comment upon any special phase of it. P. 588.
The evidence in this case was ample to justify the district court in submitting the question of the defendants’ guilt to the jury. Id.
254 F. 120 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Stilson v. United States, 250 U.S. 583 (1919) in 250 U.S. 583 250 U.S. 584. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EDG8CH5VY6FS4GN.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Stilson v. United States, 250 U.S. 583 (1919), in 250 U.S. 583, page 250 U.S. 584. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EDG8CH5VY6FS4GN.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Stilson v. United States, 250 U.S. 583 (1919). cited in 1919, 250 U.S. 583, pp.250 U.S. 584. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EDG8CH5VY6FS4GN.
|