|
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584 (1977)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584 (1977)
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip No. 75-562 Argued January 12, 1977 Decided April 4, 1977 430 U.S. 584
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Both the language and legislative history of the Acts of 1904, 1907, and 1910, whereby land in certain counties in South Dakota located within the boundaries of the Rosebud Sioux Reservation as defined in an 1889 Treaty was required to be ceded by the Reservation Indians to the Government for sale to settlers under the homestead and townsite laws with the proceeds to be credited to the Indians only as received or, with respect to certain parcels, for transfer to South Dakota for school use, held clearly to evidence a congressional intent to diminish the boundaries of the Reservation. Although such Acts were unilateral Acts of Congress without the consent of three-fourths of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s adult male members, as was required by the original 1868 Treaty establishing the Reservation, that fact does not directly bear on the question whether Congress, by these later Acts, intended to diminish the Reservation boundaries. Nor is it conclusive with respect to congressional intent that these Acts changed the method of payment from an outright, fixed-sum payment to the Indians required by a 1901 Agreement that would have amended the 1889 Treaty and would have resulted in a diminution of the Reservation boundaries, but which, although approved by three-fourths of the Tribe’s adult male members, was never ratified by Congress. Pp. 586-615.
521 F.2d 87, affirmed.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and WHITE, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ., joined. MARSHALL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN and STEWART, JJ., joined, post, p. 615.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584 (1977) in 430 U.S. 584 430 U.S. 585. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=E7X84AR1XCCML2R.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584 (1977), in 430 U.S. 584, page 430 U.S. 585. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=E7X84AR1XCCML2R.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584 (1977). cited in 1977, 430 U.S. 584, pp.430 U.S. 585. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=E7X84AR1XCCML2R.
|