|
|
City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507 (1973)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507 (1973)
City of Kenosha v. Bruno No. 72-658 Argued April 18, 1973 Decided June 11, 1973 412 U.S. 507
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Syllabus
Appellees, who, apparently because of alleged nude dancing at their retail liquor establishments, were denied renewal of their one-year liquor licenses, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for declaratory and injunctive relief against the cities of Racine and Kenosha. Appellees claimed deprivation of procedural due process arising from the cities’ failure to hold full-blown adversary hearings before refusing to issue license renewals, and the unconstitutionality of the local licensing scheme. The Wisconsin Attorney General intervened as a party defendant in the proceedings. The cases were submitted on cross-motions for summary judgment and stipulations of fact. A three-judge District Court held that, in light of the "equitable nature" of the actions, it had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343, and the court declared the statutory scheme unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement.
Held:
1. A city is not a "person" under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 where equitable relief is sought, any more than it is where damages are sought, Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 187, and the District Court, therefore, erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction over the complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1343 since only the two municipalities were named as defendants. Pp. 511-513.
2. The District Court, on remand, should consider the jurisdictional questions presented by the State Attorney General’s intervention and the availability of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 jurisdiction, as well as the decisions in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, and Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, which are germane to the due process issue, and the supervening decision in California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109, dealing with broad state authority over liquor distribution. Pp. 513-515.
346 F.Supp. 43, vacated and remanded.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, STEWART, WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BRENNAN, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 516. DOUGLAS, J., filed an opinion dissenting in part, post, p. 516.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507 (1973) in 412 U.S. 507 412 U.S. 508. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DXK1GMA737TSFV4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507 (1973), in 412 U.S. 507, page 412 U.S. 508. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DXK1GMA737TSFV4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507 (1973). cited in 1973, 412 U.S. 507, pp.412 U.S. 508. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DXK1GMA737TSFV4.
|