Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 196 U.S. 589, click here.
Coulter v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company No. 244 Argued November 29-30, 1904 Decided February 20, 1905 196 U.S. 599
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
A railroad company in Kentucky claimed as its only ground of federal jurisdiction in an action in the circuit court of the United States against members of the state board of valuation and assessment that, under the tax laws of the state, it was deprived of equal protection of the laws contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment, because, while the law of the state required all property to be taxed at its fair cash value, there was a uniform and general undervaluation of other property, but the company’s property was taxed at its full value. There was conflicting testimony as to the valuations, most of the members of the board testifying that they tried in good faith to reach fair cash values. Held that:
The court will not intervene merely on the ground of a mistake in judgment on the part of the officer to whom the duty of assessment was entrusted by the law.
It is not beyond the power of a state, so far as the federal Constitution is concerned, to tax the franchise of a corporation at a different rate from the tangible property in the state.
Where the only constitutional ground on which the complainant can come into the circuit court obviously fails, the court should be very cautious in interfering with the state’s administration of its taxes upon other considerations which would not have given it jurisdiction.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905) in 196 U.S. 599 196 U.S. 604. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DS2N98CWPG4RHRE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905), in 196 U.S. 599, page 196 U.S. 604. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DS2N98CWPG4RHRE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905). cited in 1905, 196 U.S. 599, pp.196 U.S. 604. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DS2N98CWPG4RHRE.
|