|
W. B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh, 295 U.S. 56 (1935)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
W. B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh, 295 U.S. 56 (1935)
W. B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh No. 556 Argued March 7, 1935 Decided April 1, 1935 295 U.S. 56
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Syllabus
Several years after negotiable bonds secured by a mortgage of benefit assessments had been issued by a municipal improvement district, statutes were passed which greatly diminished the remedies for their security provided by law at the time of their issuance, viz: the time within which an assessment might be foreclosed and the assessed land sold for default in payment of the assessment was enlarged from approximately 65 days to at least 2 1/ years, and it might be much longer; provisions for adding a penalty of 20%, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees, were altered by omitting the costs and attorneys’ fees and reducing the penalty to 3%; a provision allowing the purchaser at foreclosure sale to go into possession upon confirmation of the sale and keep the rents and profits during the years allowed for redemption was repealed, so that the possession of the delinquent owner might remain for another four years unaffected by the sale. The mortgagee was thus left for at least 6 1/2 years without an effective remedy, and there would be no enforceable obligation in the meantime to pay installments of principal or even accruing coupons. Held in violation of the contract clause of the Constitution. Home Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, distinguished; W. B. Worthen Co. v. Thomas, 292 U.S. 426, followed. P. 60.
189 Ark. 723, 75 S.W.2d 62, reversed.
Appeal from the affirmance of a decree in a suit to foreclose benefit assessments on the lots in a public improvement district. The assessments were mortgaged as security for negotiable bonds issued by the Improvement District to pay for the improvements, and the suit was brought by the mortgage trustee and some of the bondholders. The decree appealed from was limited by recent statutes which were attacked as unconstitutional.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," W. B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh, 295 U.S. 56 (1935) in 295 U.S. 56 295 U.S. 57. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D848GZAU68EMT8W.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." W. B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh, 295 U.S. 56 (1935), in 295 U.S. 56, page 295 U.S. 57. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D848GZAU68EMT8W.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in W. B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh, 295 U.S. 56 (1935). cited in 1935, 295 U.S. 56, pp.295 U.S. 57. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D848GZAU68EMT8W.
|