|
|
Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker, 338 U.S. 304 (1949)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker, 338 U.S. 304 (1949)
Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker No. 55 Argued October 20, 1949 Decided November 21, 1949 338 U.S. 304
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
In an arrangement proceeding instituted by a corporate debtor under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, an indenture trustee objected to the allowance of claims equal to the principal amount of debentures acquired at a discount, while the debtor was insolvent, by respondents, who were close relatives and an office associate of the debtor’s directors. The referee found, in effect, that there was no bad faith or unfair dealing, and that, during the period of the purchases, respondents’ conduct with reference to the affairs of the debtor was to its material benefit. The referee dismissed the objections, and both the District Court and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: on the record in this case, equitable considerations do not require that respondents’ claims be limited to the cost of the debentures plus interest. Pp. 305-315.
(a) The two respondents, who were close relatives of the director purchased all their debentures while the debtor was a going concern (though technically insolvent), and, even if their claims be viewed as claims of directors, the probability that an actual conflict of interests arose from their purchases is not great enough to justify the exercise of equity jurisdiction to limit their claims to the cost of the debentures plus interest. Pp. 309-313.
(b) The third respondent did purchase a small portion of his debentures after the debtor ceased to be a going concern, but he was merely an office associate and friend of the directors, he had begun to buy debentures some months before their election, there was nothing to indicate that his purchases after they became directors were influenced by advice from them, they had no interest in his holdings, and consideration of his claim as that of a director is precluded. Pp.314-315.
173 F.2d 944 affirmed.
In a proceeding under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, the referee’s dismissal of objections to the allowance of certain claims was affirmed by the District Court (80 F.Supp. 822) and the Court of Appeals (173 F.2d 944). This Court granted certiorari. 337 U.S. 923. Affirmed, p. 315.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker, 338 U.S. 304 (1949) in 338 U.S. 304 338 U.S. 305. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D7F2LSZKX96CTE8.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker, 338 U.S. 304 (1949), in 338 U.S. 304, page 338 U.S. 305. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D7F2LSZKX96CTE8.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker, 338 U.S. 304 (1949). cited in 1949, 338 U.S. 304, pp.338 U.S. 305. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D7F2LSZKX96CTE8.
|