|
Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 377 U.S. 386 (1964)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 377 U.S. 386 (1964)
Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. No. 490 Argued April 30, 1964 Decided June 1, 1964 * 377 U.S. 386
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Syllabus
Under the McGuire Act, a trademark owner may, where sanctioned by a state fair trade act, enforce a minimum retail price established by written agreements with some retailers in the State against a notified retailer who has not signed such an agreement. Pp. 386-395.
174 Ohio St. 487, 190 N.E.2d 460, affirmed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 377 U.S. 386 (1964) in 377 U.S. 386 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D4C3D27G3B8RPEB.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 377 U.S. 386 (1964), in 377 U.S. 386, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D4C3D27G3B8RPEB.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 377 U.S. 386 (1964). cited in 1964, 377 U.S. 386. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D4C3D27G3B8RPEB.
|