|
Wecker v. National Enameling Co., 204 U.S. 176 (1907)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Wecker v. National Enameling Co., 204 U.S. 176 (1907)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 204 U.S. 170, click here.
Wecker v. National Enameling and Stamping Company No. 133 Submitted December 14, 1906 Decided January 7, 1907 204 U.S. 176
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
Where the circuit court refuses to remand, and on the plaintiff’s declining to recognize its jurisdiction or proceed, dismisses the case and renders judgment that plaintiff take nothing thereby and defendant go hence without day and recover his costs, the judgment is final, so far as that suit is concerned, and the question of jurisdiction can be certified to this Court under § 5 of the Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 827.
The right of a nonresident defendant, sued in the state court by an employee for damages, to remove the case to the federal court cannot be defeated by the fraudulent joinder as codefendant of another employee, resident of plaintiff’s state, who has no relation to the plaintiff, rendering him liable for the injuries, and the circuit court can determine the question of fraudulent joinder on affidavits annexed to the nonresident defendant’s petition for removal to the consideration whereof plaintiff does not object, but submits affidavits counter thereto. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Thompson, 200 U.S. 206, distinguished.
Where the direct issue of fraud is involved, knowledge may be imputed to one willfully closing his eyes to information within reach.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wecker v. National Enameling Co., 204 U.S. 176 (1907) in 204 U.S. 176 204 U.S. 177. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CWKRDQDYMXY4VRK.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wecker v. National Enameling Co., 204 U.S. 176 (1907), in 204 U.S. 176, page 204 U.S. 177. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CWKRDQDYMXY4VRK.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wecker v. National Enameling Co., 204 U.S. 176 (1907). cited in 1907, 204 U.S. 176, pp.204 U.S. 177. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CWKRDQDYMXY4VRK.
|