Dayton Bd. Of Educ. v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406 (1977)

MR. JUSTICE STEVENS, concurring.

With the caveat that the relevant finding of intent in a case of this kind necessarily depends primarily on objective evidence concerning the effect of the Board’s action, rather than the subjective motivation of one or more members of the Board, see Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 253-254 (STEVENS, J., concurring), I join the Court’s opinion.