|
|
Blake v. Openhym, 216 U.S. 322 (1910)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Blake v. Openhym, 216 U.S. 322 (1910)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 216 U.S. 311, click here.
Blake v. Openhym No. 71 Submitted January 11, 1910 Decided February 12, 1910 216 U.S. 322
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
The judgment in this case that the vendor of goods sold to the bankrupt had a right to, and did, rescind the contract of sale on the ground that the goods were obtained by the bankrupt’s fraud, and that the rescission was seasonably made on that ground, involves no provision of the bankruptcy law, but depends on principles of general law, and an appeal will not lie to this Court from the judgment of the circuit court of appeals. Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U.S. 89.
Where, after writ of replevin, the state court turns the goods over to the receiver, who so receives them on the express condition that he assume the liabilities incurred in that court which has held that the liability under the redelivery bond was incurred for benefit of the estate, no provision of the Bankruptcy Act is involved that would make the decision reviewable in this Court on writ of error.
Where, after replevin, the paramount authority of the bankruptcy court is conceded and the replevin suit is considered only as evidence of rescission and identification of goods, no provision af the bankruptcy law or jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court is involved on which a writ of error from, or an appeal to, this Court can be based.
157 F. 536 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Blake v. Openhym, 216 U.S. 322 (1910) in 216 U.S. 322 216 U.S. 323–216 U.S. 324. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CM27XSQ2B1UYI87.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Blake v. Openhym, 216 U.S. 322 (1910), in 216 U.S. 322, pp. 216 U.S. 323–216 U.S. 324. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CM27XSQ2B1UYI87.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Blake v. Openhym, 216 U.S. 322 (1910). cited in 1910, 216 U.S. 322, pp.216 U.S. 323–216 U.S. 324. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CM27XSQ2B1UYI87.
|