|
|
Havnor v. New York, 170 U.S. 408 (1898)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Havnor v. New York, 170 U.S. 408 (1898)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 170 U.S. 402, click here.
Havnor v. New York No. 227 Argued April 21, 1898 Decided May 9, 1898 170 U.S. 408
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
It was essential, in order to confer jurisdiction on this Court in this case, that the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, or his lawful substitute, or a justice of this Court should have allowed the writ and signed the citation, and as the writ was signed by a judge as "Asso. Judge, Court of Appeals, New York," and there was nothing in the record warranting the inference that he was at that time, acting as Chief Judge pro tem. of that court, the writ is dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Havnor v. New York, 170 U.S. 408 (1898) in 170 U.S. 408 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CIZCRSU7C19E9C3.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Havnor v. New York, 170 U.S. 408 (1898), in 170 U.S. 408, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CIZCRSU7C19E9C3.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Havnor v. New York, 170 U.S. 408 (1898). cited in 1898, 170 U.S. 408. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CIZCRSU7C19E9C3.
|