|
Memoirs,
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryÉTIENNE DENIS PASQUIER, born in 1767, sprang from a family which had long been distinguished at the French bar. He was himself intended for the legal profession, and at an early age he entered the parlement of Paris. He witnessed many of the scenes of the French Revolution, under Napoleon became a baron, and served the emperor faithfully. After Napoleon’s downfall Pasquier held important offices of state under Louis XVIII, Charles X, and Louis Philippe. He retired from active life in 1848, for the purpose of compiling the reminiscences of his long and honorable career. Pasquier’s views were those of a moderate reformer, who desired to renovate, but not to end, the old monarchy. He welcomed the Restoration of 1815 as "bringing back France to the form of government best suited for it." The following account of the Old Régime, with which Pasquier begins his Memoirs, must be read in the light of the author’s conservative tendencies.
Historical SummaryPasquier, whose father had been previously guillotined, did not escape suspicion during the Terror. In 1794 he was arrested, together with his wife, and taken to the prison of St.-Lazare. A younger brother and two brothers-in-law were already confined there. The coup d’état of the "9th Thermidor" (July 27, 1794) led to the overthrow of Robespierre. As a consequence of the reaction in favor of ordinary government, Pasquier regained his liberty and his estates.
112. The Reign of Terror1
In the month of March, 1793, the revolutionary tribunals
were organized, together with the committees of General Police
and of Public Safety. The émigrés, the aristocrats, and the
enemies of the Revolution were all outlawed, and a revolutionary
army was especially intrusted with hunting them down.
The law of the suspects spread out a huge net from which
no one might hope to escape. Fresh prisons were opened in
all directions, and they could scarcely hold the number of unfortunate
people stowed away in them. The Convention let loose
all over the country deputies chosen among the most ferocious
and vicious of the Mountain’s membership. France was handed
over defenseless to these representatives of the people, clothed
with the most unlimited powers, and disposing, at their own free
will, of the liberty and life of any individual whom it pleased
them to call a counter-revolutionist.
In every department, in every town, they found docile executors
of all their acts of savagery — a score or so of wretches,
all or almost all sprung from the dregs of the population, hardly
able to write their names, but invested with the title of members
of the Revolutionary Committee. For the purpose of having
their orders carried out, they called into requisition the help of
the inert mass of citizens, which knows only how to sigh and
obey, and thus, during a term of eighteen months, the very
man who was to be arrested the following day took part in
the arrests of the foregoing one. He who was to perish during
the next week often escorted to the scaffold, while shouldering
a pike, the victims of the current week. Officers, soldiers, generals,
officials, rich and poor, all stood alike in fear of these modern
proconsuls, and all fled who had the means of flight at their
disposal. But it was very hard to escape their vigilance when
one belonged to the proscribed class.
In every one of the large prisons were a certain number of
scoundrels, apparently detained as prisoners like the others,
but who were really there to select and draw up a list of the
victims. Several of them had become known as spies, and,
incredible as it may seem, their lives were spared by those in
the midst of whom they fulfilled their shameful duty. On the
contrary, the prisoners treated them gently and paid them
court. I had scarcely passed the first wicket, and was following
the jailer who was taking me to the room I was to occupy,
when I found myself face to face with M. de Montrou, already
notorious through his scandalous intrigues, and whose adventures
have since created such a stir in society. He came close to me,
and without pretending to notice me, whispered into my ear the
following salutary bit of advice: "While here, do not speak a
word to anybody whom you do not know thoroughly."
On reaching with Mme. Pasquier the lodging destined for
our use, and which had been vacated by the two victims of the
previous day, we were soon surrounded by our relations, and
by a few friends who hastened to offer us all the assistance they
could. We were enjoying, as far as one can enjoy anything
when in a similar position, these proofs of kindly interest and
friendship, when one of my brothers-in-law, who was looking
out of the window, exclaimed, "Ah, here is Pépin Dégrouettes
about to take his daily walk. We must go and show ourselves.
Come along with us." "Why so?" I queried, whereupon I
was told that he was the principal one among the rascals whose
abominable réle I have described. . . . Every afternoon he
would thus take a turn in the yard, and it was for him the occasion
of passing in review, so to speak, the flock which he was
gradually sending to the slaughter-house. Woe unto him who
seemed to hide, or to avoid his look! Such a one was immediately
noted, and he could be sure that his turn would come next.
Many a gallant man’s death became a settled thing, because he
was a few minutes late in coming down into the yard and passing
under the fellow’s notice. The surrendering oneself to his discretion
was apparently a way of imploring mercy at his hands.
We went through the formality, and it constituted a scene
which I never can forget. I can still see him, a man four feet,
seven inches, or four feet, eight inches high, hump-backed, of
twisted form, bandy-legged, and as red-headed as Judas. He
was completely surrounded by prisoners, some of whom walked
backward in his presence, earnestly soliciting a look from him.
We were told a few days later that, when the last list was
made up, he and his assistants had experienced a feeling of pity
for my young brother whose name was on it, and that they had
stricken it out. His lively, frank, and open demeanor, and
the habit of seeing him for so long (he was, in spite of his youth,
the oldest resident of the prison), had inspired them with a kindly
feeling of which they could not divest themselves. To this
must be attributed his not having shared the fate of young
Mailly, who was sent to the scaffold for the offense they had
committed in common, and which consisted in throwing in the
face of the keeper of the prison some rotten herrings, telling
him ironically that he might feast on them. . . .
We all considered ourselves doomed victims, and did not
think that there remained the slightest chance of salvation,
when the morning of the 9th Thermidor dawned. The day
passed without the slightest echo of what was happening outside
penetrating our prison walls. On the morning of the 10th,
a few of us were informed by turnkeys whom we had remunerated
for certain personal services, that Robespierre had been
brought to the prison during the night, and that those who
had him in custody sought to have him incarcerated there, but
the jailor refused to receive him. This alone was a sufficient
proof that a most important event was taking place, and during
the course of the day we succeeded in obtaining newspapers
which told us all. . . .
When I left St.-Lazare, I found that the march of events had
been rapid, and that their trend was more and more pronounced
in favor of order and justice. After having been violently
repressed, the more enlightened and the more respectable portion
of the population was about to enjoy the right of living
openly. How can I describe the joy of the friends and relations
come back to life from prisons, or from obscure hidingplaces,
who had lost all hope of meeting again, who inquired
as to the fate of beloved ones, and about those whom they had
lost. Their sweetest consolation was to be able to weep together
over those who had fallen under the revolutionary scythe. The
first use to which they put their freedom was to make a public
display of their grief and of their lamentations. During the
Terror, and especially during the last six months of its reign,
no one dared to wear mourning for those who had perished on
the scaffold. Mingled with so many heart-rending recollections
was the joy felt over a deliverance which might more appropriately
be styled a resurrection. . . .
None of the terrible laws made during the two past years
were abrogated, but this did not trouble people. The greater
part of the assassins, both leaders and hirelings, were still in
possession of their lives; they mingled unpunished with their
victims. Who was there to call them to account for the blood
which they had shed? Contempt protected them against
hatred, and so, escaping public vengeance, they vanished from
sight.
1 Pasquier, vol. i, pp. 95#8211;96, 116–120.
Contents:
Chicago: "The Reign of Terror," Memoirs, in Readings in Modern European History, ed. Webster, Hutton (Boston: D.C. Heath, 1926), 235–238. Original Sources, accessed November 23, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CIBGLA7F7BMKY7N.
MLA: . "The Reign of Terror." Memoirs,, Vol. i, in Readings in Modern European History, edited by Webster, Hutton, Boston, D.C. Heath, 1926, pp. 235–238. Original Sources. 23 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CIBGLA7F7BMKY7N.
Harvard: , 'The Reign of Terror' in Memoirs,. cited in 1926, Readings in Modern European History, ed. , D.C. Heath, Boston, pp.235–238. Original Sources, retrieved 23 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CIBGLA7F7BMKY7N.
|