|
|
Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn., 288 U.S. 469 (1933)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn., 288 U.S. 469 (1933)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 288 U.S. 467, click here.
Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis No. 523 Argued February 14, 1933 Decided March 13, 1933 288 U.S. 469
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Several rail carriers agreed with a single transfer company that only its places of business should be designated as their "off-track" stations in a certain city; that it should have the exclusive right to transfer less-than-carload freight between their "on-track" stations and between them and the "off-track" stations in the city, and that they would file the necessary amended tariffs with the Interstate Commerce Commission to carry out the agreement, and would pay for the transfer services at prescribed rates, absorbed in their line-haul rates. Tariffs were filed accordingly and approved by the Commission. Held that a rival transfer company, which was excluded by this arrangement from business that it previously had enjoyed, had no standing under § 16 of the Clayton Act to enjoin performance of the agreement as contrary to the Sherman Act, since it is provided by the Clayton Act that no one except the United States shall be thereby entitled to sue for injunctive relief against any common carrier subject to the Interstate Commerce Act "in respect of any matter subject to the regulation, supervision, or other jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission." P. 473.
61 F.2d 546 affirmed.
Certiorari, 287 U.S. 595, to review the affirmance of a decree dismissing a suit by a transfer company against numerous interstate carriers and another transfer company to restrain an alleged violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn., 288 U.S. 469 (1933) in 288 U.S. 469 288 U.S. 470. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CF2N7SEGCYUVH33.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn., 288 U.S. 469 (1933), in 288 U.S. 469, page 288 U.S. 470. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CF2N7SEGCYUVH33.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn., 288 U.S. 469 (1933). cited in 1933, 288 U.S. 469, pp.288 U.S. 470. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CF2N7SEGCYUVH33.
|