|
Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Elec. Light Co., 256 U.S. 512 (1921)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Elec. Light Co., 256 U.S. 512 (1921)
Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Company No. 29, Original Argued March 15, 16, 1921 Decided June 1, 1921 256 U.S. 512
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Syllabus
In a suit brought by a gas company against a city to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance rate alleged to be confiscatory, this Court, by its former decision (250 U.S. 256), affirmed, with modifications, the decree of the district court dismissing the bill, and issued its mandate, reciting the decision and directing "that such execution and proceedings be had in said cause as according to right and justice . . . ought to be had, the said appeal notwithstanding."
Held:
(1) That the court below had jurisdiction, through a special master, to ascertain the amounts collected by the company from its customers in excess of the ordinance rate, pending the litigation, and to require repayment thereof, with interest, in accordance with the terms of a bond that the company filed in the cause in order to obtain a supersedeas, with continuance of injunction, pending its appeal. P. 516.
(2) That the absence of the customers as parties was no obstacle to such enforcement of their equitable rights, represented in the litigation by the city and recognized and protected by the bond. P. 517.
(3) That the fact that the affirmance modified the lower court’s decree so as to dismiss the bill without prejudice to the filing of another in case changed conditions should render the rate confiscatory did not restrict the lower court’s jurisdiction to the overcharges made before its decree was entered, since the ordinance rate remained presumably valid until proven otherwise in a new suit, and the bond required repayment of all overcharges collected while the company had the benefit of the injunction pending the appeal. P. 518.
Rule discharged.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Elec. Light Co., 256 U.S. 512 (1921) in 256 U.S. 512 256 U.S. 513. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CEV6DM36A5PM51J.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Elec. Light Co., 256 U.S. 512 (1921), in 256 U.S. 512, page 256 U.S. 513. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CEV6DM36A5PM51J.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Elec. Light Co., 256 U.S. 512 (1921). cited in 1921, 256 U.S. 512, pp.256 U.S. 513. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=CEV6DM36A5PM51J.
|