Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 312 U.S. 492, click here.
Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Company No. 283 Argued February 4, 1941 Decided March 3, 1941 312 U.S. 496
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Syllabus
A railroad company, some of whose trains in Texas had each but one Pullman sleeping car and that in charge of a colored porter subject to the control of the train conductor, assailed in the federal court, as unauthorized by Texas statutes and as violative of the Federal Constitution, a regulation by a state commission which would require that such cars be continuously in charge of an employee "having the rank and position of a Pullman conductor." Pullman porters, intervening, also attacked the order, adopting the railroad’s objections but urging mainly that it discriminated against Negroes in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Pullman porters being Negroes and the conductors white.
Held:
1. Decision of the issue of unconstitutional discrimination should be withheld pending proceedings to be taken in the state courts to secure a definitive construction of the state statute. P. 498.
2. The federal courts, when asked for the extraordinary remedy of injunction, will exercise a sound discretion in the public interest to avoid needless friction with state policies that may result from tentative constructions of state statutes and premature adjudication on their constitutionality. P. 500.
33 F.Supp. 675, reversed.
APPEAL from a decree of the District Court of three judges which enjoined the enforcement of an order of the above-named Railroad Commission.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941) in 312 U.S. 496 312 U.S. 497. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C8X6D8RRSLXD21N.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941), in 312 U.S. 496, page 312 U.S. 497. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C8X6D8RRSLXD21N.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941). cited in 1941, 312 U.S. 496, pp.312 U.S. 497. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C8X6D8RRSLXD21N.
|