|
United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co., 265 U.S. 189 (1924)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co., 265 U.S. 189 (1924)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 265 U.S. 182, click here.
United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Company No. 477 Argued April 9, 1924 Decided May 26, 1924 265 U.S. 189
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
1. The "Revenue Act of 1918" (passed February 24, 1919), in the income tax provisions applicable to corporations, adopts the definition of gross income applicable to individuals (§ 213), which excludes "the proceeds of life insurance policies paid upon the death of the insured to individual beneficiaries or to the estate of the insured." Held that there was no purpose, in the exemption, to distinguish between individual beneficiaries and corporate beneficiaries, and that the proceeds of insurance taken by a corporation on the life of an important official, to secure its financial position and indemnify itself against loss of earning power in case of his death were not taxable as income under the act. P. 194.
2. Assuming that Congress could tax proceeds of such indemnity life insurance as income, its purpose to do so should be express, in view of the popular conception of life insurance as resulting in a single addition to the resources of the beneficiary, and not in a periodical return. P. 195.
3. A construction of a war taxing act as imposing both an income and an estate tax on the proceeds of life insurance should be avoided unless required in express terms. Id.
58 Ct. Clms. 343 affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims allowing recovery of money paid under protest as an income tax.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co., 265 U.S. 189 (1924) in 265 U.S. 189 265 U.S. 190–265 U.S. 192. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C7JUJ174X76FHDZ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co., 265 U.S. 189 (1924), in 265 U.S. 189, pp. 265 U.S. 190–265 U.S. 192. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C7JUJ174X76FHDZ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co., 265 U.S. 189 (1924). cited in 1924, 265 U.S. 189, pp.265 U.S. 190–265 U.S. 192. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C7JUJ174X76FHDZ.
|