|
Windward Shipping v. American Radio Assn., 415 U.S. 104 (1974)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Windward Shipping v. American Radio Assn., 415 U.S. 104 (1974)
Windward Shipping (London) Ltd. v. American Radio Association, AFL-CIO No. 72-1061 Argued December 3-4, 1973 Decided February 19, 1974 415 U.S. 104
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS,
FOURTEENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Syllabus
Petitioners, foreign-flag shipowners and agents, sought injunctive relief in the Texas state courts to bar, as tortious under Texas law, the picketing of their vessels by respondent unions, which were protesting as substandard the wages paid to the foreign crewmen, who manned the vessels. The trial court sustained respondents’ contention that state court jurisdiction was preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), and the appellate court affirmed.
Held: Respondents’ activities, which did not involve wages paid within this country, but were designed to force the foreign vessels to raise their operating costs to levels comparable to those of American shippers, would have materially affected the foreign ships’ "maritime operations" and precipitated responses by the foreign shipowners in the field of international relations transcending the domestic wage-cost decision that the LMRA was designed to regulate. Respondents’ picketing was consequently not activity "affecting commerce" as defined in §§ 2(6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the LMRA, and the Texas courts erred in holding that they were prevented by the LMRA from entertaining petitioners’ injunction suit. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, 353 U.S. 138, followed; Longshoremen v. Ariadne Co., 397 U.S. 195, distinguished. Pp. 109-116
482 S.W.2d 675, reversed.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and WHITE, STEWART, BLACKMUN, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BRENNAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DOUGLAS and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 116.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Windward Shipping v. American Radio Assn., 415 U.S. 104 (1974) in 415 U.S. 104 415 U.S. 105. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C6YN7IC6SU1XEWS.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Windward Shipping v. American Radio Assn., 415 U.S. 104 (1974), in 415 U.S. 104, page 415 U.S. 105. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C6YN7IC6SU1XEWS.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Windward Shipping v. American Radio Assn., 415 U.S. 104 (1974). cited in 1974, 415 U.S. 104, pp.415 U.S. 105. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C6YN7IC6SU1XEWS.
|