|
|
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964)
Compco Corporation v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. No. 106 Argued January 16, 1964 Decided March 9, 1964 376 U.S. 234
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Design which is not entitled to design patent may be copied at will even though it identifies maker to trade, and injunction against such copying or an accounting for damages for copying is in conflict with federal patent laws. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., ante, p. 225, followed. Pp. 234-239.
311 F.2d 26, reversed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964) in 376 U.S. 234 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C4PSXIDM899KSCT.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964), in 376 U.S. 234, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C4PSXIDM899KSCT.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964). cited in 1964, 376 U.S. 234. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C4PSXIDM899KSCT.
|