|
South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. Newport, 259 U.S. 97 (1922)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. Newport, 259 U.S. 97 (1922)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 259 U.S. 80, click here.
South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Company v. City of Newport No. 203 Argued April 13, 1922 Decided May 15, 1922 259 U.S. 97
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
The bill alleged that the plaintiffs were corporations operating electric street cars and distributing electric current under perpetual franchises in the city; that, under supervision and direction of the city authorities, they constructed a high tension wire to obtain necessary additional current from another company; that, afterwards, the city council, by resolution, directed speedy removal of the wire, declaring it dangerous to life and property, contrary to the fact, and that, unless restrained, the city would forcibly remove and destroy it, thereby interfering with the operation of plaintiffs’ railway, lighting, and power systems, and causing them irreparable damage, in violation of their rights under the Contract Clause of the Constitution and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and prayed that the resolution be declared null and the city, it officers, etc., be enjoined from enforcing it.
Held:
(1) That the bill set up a substantial federal question and conferred jurisdiction on the district court. P. 99. Des Moines v. Des Moines City Ry. Co., 214 U.S. 179, distinguished.
(2) That the jurisdiction, having attached, could not be defeated by an answer denying the city’s intention to enforce the resolution except through an order of court. P. 100.
Reversed.
Appeal from a decree of the district court dismissing for want of jurisdiction a bill to restrain the defendant city from forcible removal and destruction of an electric wire.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. Newport, 259 U.S. 97 (1922) in 259 U.S. 97 259 U.S. 98. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BBY8IUUVAHE6KUK.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. Newport, 259 U.S. 97 (1922), in 259 U.S. 97, page 259 U.S. 98. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BBY8IUUVAHE6KUK.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. Newport, 259 U.S. 97 (1922). cited in 1922, 259 U.S. 97, pp.259 U.S. 98. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BBY8IUUVAHE6KUK.
|