|
|
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
Baker v. Carr No. 6 Argued April 19-20, 1961 Set for reargument May 1, 1961 Reargued October 9, 1961 Decided March 26, 1962 369 U.S. 186
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Syllabus
Appellants are persons allegedly qualified to vote for members of the General Assembly of Tennessee representing the counties in which they reside. They brought suit in a Federal District Court in Tennessee under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to redress the alleged deprivation of their federal constitutional rights by legislation classifying voters with respect to representation in the General Assembly. They alleged that, by means of a 1901 statute of Tennessee arbitrarily and capriciously apportioning the seats in the General Assembly among the State’s 95 counties, and a failure to reapportion them subsequently notwithstanding substantial growth and redistribution of the State’s population, they suffer a "debasement of their votes," and were thereby denied the equal protection of the laws guaranteed them by the Fourteenth Amendment. They sought, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that the 1901 statute is unconstitutional and an injunction restraining certain state officers from conducting any further elections under it. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter and that no claim was stated upon which relief could be granted.
Held:
1. The District Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the federal constitutional claim asserted in the complaint. Pp. 198-204.
2. Appellants had standing to maintain this suit. Pp. 204-208.
3. The complaint’s allegations of a denial of equal protection presented a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which appellants are entitled to a trial and a decision. Pp. 208-37.
179 F.Supp. 824, reversed and cause remanded
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) in 369 U.S. 186 369 U.S. 187. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=AQRF6YY6LLD49CC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), in 369 U.S. 186, page 369 U.S. 187. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=AQRF6YY6LLD49CC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). cited in 1962, 369 U.S. 186, pp.369 U.S. 187. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=AQRF6YY6LLD49CC.
|