|
|
Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 (1972)
Adams v. Illinois No. 70-5038 Argued December 7, 1971 Decided March 6, 1972 405 U.S. 278
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
Petitioner’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment against him because of the court’s failure to appoint counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing in 1967 was denied, and petitioner was tried and convicted. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed on the ground that Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, in which this Court held that a preliminary hearing is a critical stage of the criminal process at which the accused is constitutionally entitled to assistance of counsel, did not have retroactive application.
Held: The judgment is affirmed. Pp. 280-286.
46 Ill.2d 200, 263 N.E.2d 490, affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concluded that Coleman v. Alabama, supra, does not apply retroactively to preliminary hearings conducted before June 22, 1970, when Coleman was decided. Pp. 281-285.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER concurred in the result, concluding, as set forth in his dissent in Coleman, that there is no constitutional requirement that counsel should be provided at preliminary hearings. Pp. 285-286.
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN concurred in the result, concluding that Coleman was wrongly decided. P. 286.
BRENNAN, J., announced the Court’s judgment and delivered an opinion, in which STEWART and WHITE, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, post, p. 285. BLACKMUN, J., filed a statement concurring in the result, post, p. 286. DOUGLAS J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 286. POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 (1972) in 405 U.S. 278 405 U.S. 279. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=AEJP8YAD2XXFIUY.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 (1972), in 405 U.S. 278, page 405 U.S. 279. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=AEJP8YAD2XXFIUY.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 (1972). cited in 1972, 405 U.S. 278, pp.405 U.S. 279. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=AEJP8YAD2XXFIUY.
|