|
|
Nlrb v. Textile Workers, 409 U.S. 213 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Nlrb v. Textile Workers, 409 U.S. 213 (1972)
National Labor Relations Board v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029, AFL-CIO No. 71-711 Argued November 13, 1972 Decided December 7, 1972 409 U.S. 213
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Where neither the Union-employer contract nor the Union’s constitution or bylaws defined or limited the circumstances under which a member could resign from the Union, it was an unfair labor practice for the Union to fine employees who had been Union members in good standing but who had resigned during a lawful strike authorized by the members and thereafter returned to work during that strike. Pp. 215-218.
446 F.2d 369, reversed.
DOUGLAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, STEWART, WHITE, MARSHAL, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 218. BLACKMUN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 218.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Nlrb v. Textile Workers, 409 U.S. 213 (1972) in 409 U.S. 213 409 U.S. 214. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ADZB5QF8QLSYPX8.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Nlrb v. Textile Workers, 409 U.S. 213 (1972), in 409 U.S. 213, page 409 U.S. 214. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ADZB5QF8QLSYPX8.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Nlrb v. Textile Workers, 409 U.S. 213 (1972). cited in 1972, 409 U.S. 213, pp.409 U.S. 214. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ADZB5QF8QLSYPX8.
|