United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694 (1944)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694 (1944)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 322 U.S. 680, click here.
United States v. White No. 366 Argued March 6, 1944 Decided June 12, 1944 322 U.S. 694
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. The constitutional privilege against self-incrimination is essentially a personal one, applying only to natural individuals. P. 698.
2. The papers and effects which the privilege protects must be the private property of the person claiming the privilege, or at least in his possession in a purely personal capacity. P. 699.
3. An officer of an unincorporated labor union has no right, under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Federal Constitution, to refuse to produce books and records of the union -- which are in his possession and which a federal court by a subpoena duces tecum has required to be produced -- on the ground that they might tend to incriminate the union or himself as an officer thereof and individually. P. 704.
The test of the applicability of the privilege is whether one can fairly say under all the circumstances that a particular type of organization has a character so impersonal in the scope of its membership and activities that it cannot be said to embody or represent the purely private or personal interests of its constituents, but rather to embody their common or group interests only. If so, the privilege cannot be invoked on behalf of the organization or its representatives in their official capacity. P. 701.
4. Whether the person asserting the privilege in such case is a member of the union, and whether the union was subject to the provisions of the statute in relation to which the investigation was being made, are immaterial. P. 704.
137 F.2d 24 reversed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694 (1944) in 322 U.S. 694 322 U.S. 695. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=A4CSLSQJIRCM7Q9.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694 (1944), in 322 U.S. 694, page 322 U.S. 695. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=A4CSLSQJIRCM7Q9.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694 (1944). cited in 1944, 322 U.S. 694, pp.322 U.S. 695. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=A4CSLSQJIRCM7Q9.
|