|
|
Department of Commerce v. House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Department of Commerce v. House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999)
JUSTICE GINSBURG, with whom JUSTICE SOUTER joins, dissenting.
I agree with the Court that Indiana resident Hofmeister, an appellee in No. 98-564, has standing to challenge the Census 2000 plan on the ground that Indiana would lose a Representative in Congress under the Census Bureau’s proposed sampling plan. I also agree with the Court’s conclusion that the appeal in No. 98-404 should be dismissed. I would not decide whether other appellees in No. 98-564 have established standing on the basis of the expected effects of the sampling plan on intrastate redistricting. Respecting the merits, I join Parts I and II of JUSTICE STEVENS’ dissent.
Contents:
Chicago: Ginsburg, "Ginsburg, J., Dissenting," Department of Commerce v. House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999) in 525 U.S. 316 Original Sources, accessed February 5, 2025, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9QSK3RHPJBKNZX9.
MLA: Ginsburg. "Ginsburg, J., Dissenting." Department of Commerce v. House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999), in 525 U.S. 316, Original Sources. 5 Feb. 2025. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9QSK3RHPJBKNZX9.
Harvard: Ginsburg, 'Ginsburg, J., Dissenting' in Department of Commerce v. House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999). cited in 1999, 525 U.S. 316. Original Sources, retrieved 5 February 2025, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9QSK3RHPJBKNZX9.
|