Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968)

MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissenting.

I would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted for the reasons stated by MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS.

Since the Court does reach the merits, however, I add that I agree with most of what is said in the thorough dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE FORTAS. Indeed, I would join that opinion were it not for the author’s unquestioning endorsement of the doctrine of Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533. I continue to believe that the Court’s opinion in that case misapplied the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment -- that the apportionment of the legislative body of a sovereign State, no less than the apportionment of a county government, is far too subtle and complicated a business to be resolved as a matter of constitutional law in terms of sixth-grade arithmetic. My views on that score, set out at length elsewhere,* closely parallel those expressed by MR. JUSTICE FORTAS in the present case.

* Lucas v. Colorado General Assembly, 377 U.S. 713, 744 (dissenting opinion).