Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U.S. 525 (1918)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U.S. 525 (1918)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 246 U.S. 523, click here.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Holloway No. 209 Submitted March 15, 1918 Decided April 15, 1918 246 U.S. 525
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
In an action under the Employers’ Liability Act on behalf of the widow of a deceased employee, an instruction that the measure of damages should be such as would fairly and reasonably compensate her for the loss of pecuniary benefits she might reasonably have received but for her husband’s death held correct, as a general instruction, leaving to the defendant the right to have it supplemented by another indicating that, in estimating the amount of such compensation, future benefits must be considered at their present value.
Under the Employers’ Liability Act, defendant is not entitled to have the jury instructed, as matter of law, that the value of money to the beneficiary should be measured by a specific (the legal) rate of interest, or that the duration of future benefits could not have exceeded the life expectancy of the deceased employee as given by an actuarial table.
Whether the state court has obeyed a local rule of practice requiring the substitution of correct instructions for defective ones requested is a question of state law not reviewable by this Court in an action under the Employer’s Liability Act.
When not based upon an erroneous theory of federal law, refusal of the state court to reverse a judgment upon the ground that the damages are excessive is not reviewable here in an action under the Employers’ Liability Act.
168 Ky. 262 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U.S. 525 (1918) in 246 U.S. 525 246 U.S. 526. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9BEJUC1JGNGX1NU.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U.S. 525 (1918), in 246 U.S. 525, page 246 U.S. 526. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9BEJUC1JGNGX1NU.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U.S. 525 (1918). cited in 1918, 246 U.S. 525, pp.246 U.S. 526. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9BEJUC1JGNGX1NU.
|