|
Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.P. Ry. Co., 271 U.S. 259 (1926)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.P. Ry. Co., 271 U.S. 259 (1926)
Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company No. 271 Argued April 26, 27, 1926 Decided May 24, 1926 271 U.S. 259
ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
1. A suit by a shipper to recover money exacted by a carrier under an interstate tariff alleged to be unauthorized by the Interstate Commerce Act, or unconstitutional, is within the jurisdiction of the district court, irrespective of the amount involved, as a suit arising under a law regulating commerce. Jud.Code § 24, par eighth. P. 261.
2. Preliminary resort to the Interstate Commerce Commission is not essential to a suit to recover alleged wrongful demurrage charges, no administrative question being presented. P. 262.
3. An additional demurrage charge, miscalled a penalty, of ten dollars per car, per day, imposed by tariff on cars of lumber held at initial destination beyond a specified time, for reconsignment, and found reasonable, on evidence, by the Interstate Commerce Commission, does not exceed the Commission’s statutory authority, nor the power of Congress to delegate authority to the Commission. P. 262.
4. Neither is such charge violative of due process because without notice other than that conveyed by the tariff, or violative of equal protection of the laws because applicable only to cars loaded with lumber. P. 263.
2 F.2d 292 affirmed.
Error to a judgment of the district court for the railway company in an action by the lumber company to recover a sum collected under a demurrage tariff.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.P. Ry. Co., 271 U.S. 259 (1926) in 271 U.S. 259 271 U.S. 260. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9ALWR5N8XRSQV2T.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.P. Ry. Co., 271 U.S. 259 (1926), in 271 U.S. 259, page 271 U.S. 260. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9ALWR5N8XRSQV2T.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.P. Ry. Co., 271 U.S. 259 (1926). cited in 1926, 271 U.S. 259, pp.271 U.S. 260. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9ALWR5N8XRSQV2T.
|