|
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Whiteaker, 239 U.S. 421 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Whiteaker, 239 U.S. 421 (1915)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 239 U.S. 414, click here.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company v. Whiteaker No. 111 Submitted December 6, 1915 Decided December 20, 1915 239 U.S. 421
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
In the absence of bad faith, the motive of the plaintiff in making defendant.s parties who are jointly liable does not affect the right to remove the case.
Whether the complaint states a cause of action against the resident defendant joined with a nonresident defendant is a matter of state law.
Where, as in this case, the injured plaintiff had under the law of the state a right of action against a nonresident railroad company and also against one of its employees who is a resident, he has the right to join them both as defendants, and the nonresident cannot, in the absence of showing fraud on the part of the plaintiff, remove the case as to it into the federal court.
Merely to traverse the plaintiff’s allegations upon which the liability of resident defendant rests or to apply the epithet fraudulent to the joinder is not sufficient -- the showing of fraud must compel the conclusion that the joinder was so absolutely without reasonable basis as to be made in bad faith.
252 Mo. 439 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the validity of the removal from the state to the federal court of a case against joint tortfeasors, one of which was a railroad company not a resident, and the other an individual resident, of plaintiff’s state, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Whiteaker, 239 U.S. 421 (1915) in 239 U.S. 421 239 U.S. 422–239 U.S. 423. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=92S24BNDVXANZTP.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Whiteaker, 239 U.S. 421 (1915), in 239 U.S. 421, pp. 239 U.S. 422–239 U.S. 423. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=92S24BNDVXANZTP.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Whiteaker, 239 U.S. 421 (1915). cited in 1915, 239 U.S. 421, pp.239 U.S. 422–239 U.S. 423. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=92S24BNDVXANZTP.
|