|
Ex Parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258 (1947)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ex Parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258 (1947)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 332 U.S. 245, click here.
Ex parte Fahey No. 133, Misc. Argued April 30, 1947 Decided June 23, 1947 332 U.S. 258
Syllabus
Mandamus, prohibition, and injunction against judges are extraordinary remedies which should be reserved for really extraordinary cases, and this Court will not countenance their use as substitutes for an appeal. Pp. 259-260.
Petition invoking the original jurisdiction of this Court and asking leave to file petition for writ of mandamus, prohibition, or injunction against a District Judge to vacate his order allowing fees to counsel in Fahey v. Mallonee, ante, p. 245, to prohibit any further allowance therein, and to enjoin any payments heretofore allowed, denied, p. 260.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ex Parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258 (1947) in 332 U.S. 258 332 U.S. 259. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=91GFGGJAHDKJEFY.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ex Parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258 (1947), in 332 U.S. 258, page 332 U.S. 259. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=91GFGGJAHDKJEFY.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ex Parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258 (1947). cited in 1947, 332 U.S. 258, pp.332 U.S. 259. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=91GFGGJAHDKJEFY.
|