|
|
Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (1999)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (1999)
Florida v. White No. 98-223 Argued March 23, 1999 Decided May 17, 1999 526 U.S. 559
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Syllabus
Two months after officers observed respondent using his car to deliver cocaine, he was arrested at his workplace on unrelated charges. At that time, the arresting officers seized his car without securing a warrant because they believed that it was subject to forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act (Act). During a subsequent inventory search, the police discovered cocaine in the car. Respondent was then charged with a state drug violation. At his trial on the drug charge, he moved to suppress the evidence discovered during the search, arguing that the car’s warrantless seizure violated the Fourth Amendment, thereby making the cocaine the "fruit of the poisonous tree." After the jury returned a guilty verdict, the court denied the motion, and the Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed. It also certified to the Florida Supreme Court the question whether, absent exigent circumstances, a warrantless seizure of an automobile under the Act violated the Fourth Amendment. The latter court answered the question in the affirmative, quashed the lower court opinion, and remanded.
Held: the Fourth Amendment does not require the police to obtain a warrant before seizing an automobile from a public place when they have probable cause to believe that it is forfeitable contraband. In deciding whether a challenged governmental action violates the Amendment, this Court inquires whether the action was regarded as an unlawful search and seizure when the Amendment was framed. See, e.g., Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 149. This Court has held that, when federal officers have probable cause to believe that an automobile contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment does not require them to obtain a warrant prior to searching the car for and seizing the contraband. Id. at 150-151. Although the police here lacked probable cause to believe that respondent’s car contained contraband, they had probable cause to believe that the vehicle itself was contraband under Florida law. A recognition of the need to seize readily movable contraband before it is spirited away undoubtedly underlies the early federal laws relied upon in Carroll. This need is equally weighty when the automobile, as opposed to its contents, is the contraband that the police seek to secure. In addition, this Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has consistently accorded officers greater latitude in exercising their duties in public places. Here, because the police seized respondent’s vehicle from a public area, the warrantless seizure is virtually indistinguishable from the seizure upheld in G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States, 429 U.S. 338, 351. Pp. 563-566.
710 So. 2d 949 reversed and remanded.
THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and O’CONNOR, SCALIA, KENNEDY, SOUTER, and BREYER, JJ., joined. SOUTER, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which BREYER, J., joined, post, p. 566. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which GINSBURG, J., joined, post, p. 567.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (1999) in 526 U.S. 559 526 U.S. 560–526 U.S. 561. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=91GFBH1XC3YZJQE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (1999), in 526 U.S. 559, pp. 526 U.S. 560–526 U.S. 561. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=91GFBH1XC3YZJQE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (1999). cited in 1999, 526 U.S. 559, pp.526 U.S. 560–526 U.S. 561. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=91GFBH1XC3YZJQE.
|