|
Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Ftc, 291 U.S. 587 (1934)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Ftc, 291 U.S. 587 (1934)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 291 U.S. 584, click here.
Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Federal Trade Commission No. 363 Argued February 8, 1934 Decided March 12, 1934 291 U.S. 587
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
After commencement of a proceeding by the Federal Trade Commission to compel a holding company to divest itself of the voting stock of two competing operating companies, held by it in alleged violation of the Clayton Act, a reorganization was brought about through united participation of the owners of the holding company’s shares and of the preferred stock of the operating companies, which the holding company never owned, whereby all the properties of the operating companies were acquired, through mergers, by a new corporation and the holding company was completely dissolved, pursuant to the state law.
Held that the jurisdiction of the Commission was ousted; that it had no power, even on the assumption that the reorganization was a device of the dissolved corporation to evade §§ 7 and 11 of the Act, to bring in the new corporation as a respondent and require it to divest itself of one or the other of the operating plants. Thatcher Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 272 U.S. 554; Federal Trade Comm’n v. Western Meat Co., 272 U.S. 554. P. 594.
65 F.2d 336 reversed.
Certiorari, 290 U.S. 622, to review a judgment affirming an order of the Federal Trade Commission.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Ftc, 291 U.S. 587 (1934) in 291 U.S. 587 291 U.S. 588–291 U.S. 589. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8UASDGEUYHFC646.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Ftc, 291 U.S. 587 (1934), in 291 U.S. 587, pp. 291 U.S. 588–291 U.S. 589. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8UASDGEUYHFC646.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Ftc, 291 U.S. 587 (1934). cited in 1934, 291 U.S. 587, pp.291 U.S. 588–291 U.S. 589. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8UASDGEUYHFC646.
|