|
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kitanning Iron & Steel Mfg. Co., 253 U.S. 319 (1920)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kitanning Iron & Steel Mfg. Co., 253 U.S. 319 (1920)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 253 U.S. 300, click here.
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Kitanning Iron & Steel Manufacturing Company No. 301 Argued March 26, 1920 Decided June 1, 1920 253 U.S. 319
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Syllabus
The policy of the "Uniform Demurrage Code" is to treat the car as the unit and fix a standard of diligence in releasing cars independent of the circumstances of the particular consignee. P. 324.
The "Uniform Demurrage Code" fixes 48 hours as the "Free Time" during which a car may be held for unloading without demurrage charges, but provides (1) the "Bunching Rule," designed to relieve from charges due to the carrier’s act in delivering cars in number exceeding the daily rate of shipment, and (2) the "Average Agreement Rule," under which the "Bunching Rule" is inapplicable but charge for detaining cars more than 48 hours are reduced by credit given for other car released within 24 hours during the calendar month, and it further provides that demurrage shall not be collected "[w]hen shipments are frozen while in transit so as to prevent unloading during the prescribed free time," provided the consignees "make diligent effort to unload such shipments." Held that a consignee, party to the Average Agreement plan, which was prevented from unloading a number of carloads of frozen ore during the free time, due to their accumulation and delivery by the carrier in numbers exceeding its facilities for thawing and unloading, was not relieved from demurrage by the clause governing frozen shipments. P. 323.
263 Pa.St. 205 reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kitanning Iron & Steel Mfg. Co., 253 U.S. 319 (1920) in 253 U.S. 319 253 U.S. 320. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8SHLBX2FCYUXHJE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kitanning Iron & Steel Mfg. Co., 253 U.S. 319 (1920), in 253 U.S. 319, page 253 U.S. 320. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8SHLBX2FCYUXHJE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kitanning Iron & Steel Mfg. Co., 253 U.S. 319 (1920). cited in 1920, 253 U.S. 319, pp.253 U.S. 320. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8SHLBX2FCYUXHJE.
|