|
Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 (1938)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 (1938)
Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp. No. 761 Argued April 25, 1938 Decided May 23, 1938 304 U.S. 401
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Syllabus
1. Since the adoption of the Twenty-first Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause is inapplicable to imported intoxicating liquor. P. 403.
2. A Minnesota statute provides that no licensed manufacturer or wholesaler shall import any brand of intoxicating liquors containing more than 25% of alcohol by volume, ready for sale without further processing, unless such brand is registered in the Patent Office of the United States. Held, valid under the Twenty-first Amendment as applied to a foreign corporation, licensed in Minnesota and engaged there in wholesaling liquor imported, ready for sale, from another State, under brands not registered, notwithstanding the discrimination arising in favor of liquor processed within the State and in favor of imported brands that are registered. P. 404.
3. Independently of the Twenty-first Amendment, a State has power to terminate licenses to sell intoxicating liquors. P. 404.
20 F.Supp. 1019 reversed.
Appeal from a decree of a district court of three judges enjoining the enforcement of a liquor regulation. See also 11 F.Supp. 145.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 (1938) in 304 U.S. 401 304 U.S. 402. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8Q7NWE7EC7PX913.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 (1938), in 304 U.S. 401, page 304 U.S. 402. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8Q7NWE7EC7PX913.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 (1938). cited in 1938, 304 U.S. 401, pp.304 U.S. 402. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8Q7NWE7EC7PX913.
|