O’sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 (1914)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
O’sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 (1914)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 233 U.S. 304, click here.
O’Sullivan v. Felix No. 249 Submitted March 9, 1914 Decided April 13, 1914 233 U.S. 318
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
That an action depends upon, or arises under, the laws of the United States does not preclude the application of the statute of limitations of the state. McLaine v. Rankin, 197 U.S. 154.
An action brought in the state court for damage for personal assault against persons violating Rev.Stat. § 5508 and 5509 is not an action for penalties, but for remedial damages, and the period of prescription depends upon the law of the state. Rev.Stat. § 1047 does not apply.
The criminal proceedings and punishment for public wrongs provided by Rev.Stat. §§ 1979-1981 and 5510 and the actions in law and equity for the redress of private injuries resulting from violations of laws of the United States also provided by §§ 1971981 are distinct.
The term "penalty" involve the idea of punishment for infraction of the law, and includes any extraordinary liability to which the law subjects a wrongdoer in favor of the person wronged, not limited to the damages suffered, while in a civil suit the amount of recovery for such damages is determined by the extent of the injury received and the elements constituting it.
194 F. 88 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the construction and application of the statute of limitations of the Louisiana to claims for damages for personal assaults, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," O’sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 (1914) in 233 U.S. 318 233 U.S. 319. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8HFCZRWVGYA9ZJA.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." O’sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 (1914), in 233 U.S. 318, page 233 U.S. 319. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8HFCZRWVGYA9ZJA.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in O’sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 (1914). cited in 1914, 233 U.S. 318, pp.233 U.S. 319. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8HFCZRWVGYA9ZJA.
|