|
Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U.S. 167 (1939)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U.S. 167 (1939)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 306 U.S. 161, click here.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher No. 212 Argued December 12, 1938 Decided January 30, 1939 306 U.S. 167
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
1. California tax on storage and use -- i.e., upon retention and exercise of ownership -- may be applied consistently with the commerce clause and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to an interstate railroad company in respect of supplies purchased outside of the State and brought in for prompt application in the operation of its road, such as office supplies, and rails, equipment, machinery, tools, etc., used in replacements, repairs, and extensions, and including articles ordered out of the State on specifications suitable only for use in the transportation facilities and installed immediately upon arrival at the California destination. P. 172.
2. There is an interval after the articles have reached the end of their interstate movement and before their consumption in interstate operation has begun when the "use and storage" are subject to local taxation. Helson & Randolph v. Kentucky, 279 U.S. 245, distinguished. P. 176.
23 F.Supp. 193 affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of a three-judge district court refusing a permanent injunction and dismissing the bill in a suit to restrain enforcement of the California Use Tax. The court below had at first granted an interlocutory injunction, 20 F.Supp. 940.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U.S. 167 (1939) in 306 U.S. 167 306 U.S. 170. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=84J3LTN9LEEF3T8.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U.S. 167 (1939), in 306 U.S. 167, page 306 U.S. 170. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=84J3LTN9LEEF3T8.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U.S. 167 (1939). cited in 1939, 306 U.S. 167, pp.306 U.S. 170. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=84J3LTN9LEEF3T8.
|