|
DI Santo v. Pennsylvania, 273 U.S. 34 (1927)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
DI Santo v. Pennsylvania, 273 U.S. 34 (1927)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 273 U.S. 28, click here.
Di Santo v. Pennsylvania No. 288 Argued October 27, 1926 Decided January 3, 1927 273 U.S. 34
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Syllabus
A state law requiring persons, other than railroad or steamship companies, who engage within the state in the sale of steamship tickets or orders for transportation to or from foreign countries, to procure a license, by giving proof of moral character, paying a small annual fee, and filing a bond as security against fraud or misrepresentation to purchasers, is a direct burden on foreign commerce, contravening the commerce clause of the Constitution, and cannot be sustained as a proper exercise of the state police power to prevent possible fraud. P. 35.
So held as applied to one who was authorized by four steamship companies to sell their tickets at a specified place and who was supplied by them with tickets, advertising matter, schedules of sailings, and other information and authorized by them to collect the money for the tickets sold and required to give bonds to the respective companies and to account to each for moneys receive for its tickets, less a percentage for his remuneration.
285 Pa. 1 reversed.
Error to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania sustaining a conviction of Di Santo, for selling steamship tickets without first having procured a license as required by a law of that state.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," DI Santo v. Pennsylvania, 273 U.S. 34 (1927) in 273 U.S. 34 273 U.S. 35. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=835SIELVBJB9BGQ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." DI Santo v. Pennsylvania, 273 U.S. 34 (1927), in 273 U.S. 34, page 273 U.S. 35. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=835SIELVBJB9BGQ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in DI Santo v. Pennsylvania, 273 U.S. 34 (1927). cited in 1927, 273 U.S. 34, pp.273 U.S. 35. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=835SIELVBJB9BGQ.
|