|
Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 213 U.S. 268 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 213 U.S. 268 (1909)
Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company No. 103 Argued March 5, 8, 1909 Decided April 5, 1909 213 U.S. 268
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Syllabus
The construction of a state statute by the highest court of the state must be accepted by this Court even though similar statutes of other states have been differently construed by the highest courts of those states.
A treaty between the United States and a foreign government within the constitutional limits of the treaty making power is, by the express words of the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, binding alike on national and state courts, and must be enforced by them in the litigation of private rights.
While undoubtedly the giving of actions for injury and death results in care and security against accidents to travelers, the protection and security thus afforded are too remote to be considered as elements in contemplation of the contracting powers to the Treaty of 1871 between Italy and the United States.
By a fair construction, Articles 2, 3 and 23 of the Treaty with Italy of 1871, 17 Stat. 845, do not confer upon the nonresident alien relatives of a citizen of Italy a right of action for damages for his death in one of the states of this Union although such an action is afforded by a statute of that state to native resident relatives, and although the existence of such an action might indirectly promote his safety, and so held as to the statute of Pennsylvania, it having been so construed by the highest court of that state.
216 Pa.St. 402 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 213 U.S. 268 (1909) in 213 U.S. 268 213 U.S. 271. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7YTHURXJIYPI17P.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 213 U.S. 268 (1909), in 213 U.S. 268, page 213 U.S. 271. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7YTHURXJIYPI17P.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 213 U.S. 268 (1909). cited in 1909, 213 U.S. 268, pp.213 U.S. 271. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7YTHURXJIYPI17P.
|