|
|
Wynkoop, Hallenbeck, Crawford Co. v. Gaines, 227 U.S. 4 (1913)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Wynkoop, Hallenbeck, Crawford Co. v. Gaines, 227 U.S. 4 (1913)
Wynkoop, Hallenbeck, Crawford Company v. Gaines No. 689 Motion to dismiss submitted January 6, 1913 Decided January 20, 1918 227 U.S. 4
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Where the question whether the claim against the bankrupt be allowed or not has been settled by an order of the court, questions remaining as to how the order shall be carried out are purely administrative, and as they do not involve the rejection or allowance of a claim, this Court has no power under § 25b of the Bankruptcy Act to review the decision of the circuit court of appeals.
Appeal from 196 F. 357 dismissed.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court of appeals under § 25b of the Bankruptcy Act, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wynkoop, Hallenbeck, Crawford Co. v. Gaines, 227 U.S. 4 (1913) in 227 U.S. 4 227 U.S. 6. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7WEN487LF87XGK1.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wynkoop, Hallenbeck, Crawford Co. v. Gaines, 227 U.S. 4 (1913), in 227 U.S. 4, page 227 U.S. 6. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7WEN487LF87XGK1.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wynkoop, Hallenbeck, Crawford Co. v. Gaines, 227 U.S. 4 (1913). cited in 1913, 227 U.S. 4, pp.227 U.S. 6. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7WEN487LF87XGK1.
|