Michigan Pub. Util. Comm’n v. Duke, 266 U.S. 570 (1925)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 266 U.S. 555, click here.

Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Duke

No. 283

Argued November 21, 1924
Decided January 12, 1925
266 U.S. 570

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Syllabus

1. A state law imposing upon all persons engaged in transportation for hire by motor vehicle over the public highways of the state the burdens and duties of common carriers, and requiring them to furnish indemnity bonds to secure payment of claims and liabilities.resulting from injury to property carried, when applied to a private carrier without special franchise or power of eminent domain and engaged exclusively in hauling from a place within the state to a place in another state the goods of particular factories under standing contracts with their owners violates the Commerce Clause by taking from the carrier use of instruments by means of which he carries on interstate commerce, and by imposing on him unreasonable condition precedent to his right to continue to carry on interstate commerce. P. 576.

2. To convert property used exclusively in the business of a private carrier into a public utility, or to make the owner a public carrier by legislative fiat, is beyond the power of a state, since it would be taking property for public use without just compensation, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. P. 577.

Affirmed.

Appeal from a decree of the district court granting an interlocutory injunction. See 294 F. 703.