Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp., 317 U.S. 144 (1942)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp., 317 U.S. 144 (1942)
Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp. Nos. 26 and 27 Argued October 19, 1942 Decided November 16, 1942 317 U.S. 144
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. The time within which a petition may be filed to review an order of a conciliation commissioner fixing rental or granting stay or directing sale is governed by § 39(c) of the Bankruptcy Act, and is fixed at ten days after the entry of the order "or within such extended time as the court may for cause shown allow." P. 147.
2. The ten-day period for filing a petition to review a commissioner’s order under § 39(c) is not extended by a petition for rehearing which is denied by the commissioner without reexamination of the basis of the original order. P. 150.
3. The ten-day period prescribed by § 39(c) is a limitation on the right of the aggrieved party to appeal, but not a limitation on the jurisdiction of the reviewing court to act. The District Court, in the exercise of sound discretion, can review orders on petitions to review filed after the ten-day period has run. P. 152.
4. In this case, the commissioner entertained out-of-time petitions to rehear orders fixing rental, granting stay, and directing sale, and denied the petitions upon the ground that they were inadequate to induce a reexamination of the merits of the orders they sought to reopen. Held, on the facts of this case, that the District Court did not err in refusing an out-of-time review of the merits of the original orders. P. 153.
123 F.2d 543 affirmed.
Certiorari, 315 U.S. 795, to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals which affirmed orders of the District Court en banc dismissing, for want of jurisdiction, petitions to review orders of a conciliation commissioner.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp., 317 U.S. 144 (1942) in 317 U.S. 144 317 U.S. 145. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7EV6G37TB11QSMM.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp., 317 U.S. 144 (1942), in 317 U.S. 144, page 317 U.S. 145. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7EV6G37TB11QSMM.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp., 317 U.S. 144 (1942). cited in 1942, 317 U.S. 144, pp.317 U.S. 145. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7EV6G37TB11QSMM.
|