Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 254 U.S. 343, click here.
Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Insurance Company No. 96 Submitted November 17, 1920 Decided December 13, 1920 254 U.S. 348
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. A petition to revise in matter of law under § 24b of the Bankruptcy Act is the proper remedy to review an order of an inferior court of bankruptcy vacating an adjudication and dismissing the bankruptcy proceeding for want of jurisdiction upon the motion of the bankrupt after the expiration of the time for appeal, he having neither contested the involuntary petition against him nor appealed from the adjudication. P. 352.
2. Where it appears from the averments of a petition in involuntary bankruptcy that the person proceeded against is an insurance corporation, and therefore within the exceptions of § 4b of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1910, the court of bankruptcy is without jurisdiction, and its adjudication, rendered upon due service of process and default, and not appealed from, should be vacated, and the proceeding dismissed upon the motion of the company, even after the time for appeal has expired. P. 352.
3. Where an insurance corporation adjudged bankrupt in an involuntary proceeding after the passage of the Act of 1910, upon due service of process and default, does not appeal from the adjudication, but acquiesces therein and aids the trustee in the performance of his duties in administering the estate, it is not estopped from thereafter questioning the validity of the adjudication and the power of the court and the trustee to proceed. Id.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920) in 254 U.S. 348 254 U.S. 349. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7BPMSB66WMCX3I2.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920), in 254 U.S. 348, page 254 U.S. 349. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7BPMSB66WMCX3I2.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920). cited in 1920, 254 U.S. 348, pp.254 U.S. 349. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7BPMSB66WMCX3I2.
|