|
Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 210 U.S. 217, click here.
Fauntleroy v. Lum No. 215 Argued April 27, 28, 1908 Decided May 18, 1908 210 U.S. 230
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Syllabus
A judgment is conclusive as to all the media concludendi, and it cannot be impeached either in or out of the state by showing that it was based on a mistake of law.
A judgment of a court of a state in which the cause of action did not arise, but based on an award of arbitration had in the state in which the cause did arise, is conclusive, and, under the full faith and credit clause of the federal Constitution, must be given effect in the latter state, notwithstanding the award was for a claim which could not, under the laws of that state, have been enforced in any of its courts.
80 Miss. 757 reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908) in 210 U.S. 230 210 U.S. 233. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=71AJM8RY7M5NRQC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908), in 210 U.S. 230, page 210 U.S. 233. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=71AJM8RY7M5NRQC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908). cited in 1908, 210 U.S. 230, pp.210 U.S. 233. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=71AJM8RY7M5NRQC.
|