|
|
Ballentyne v. Smith, 205 U.S. 285 (1907)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ballentyne v. Smith, 205 U.S. 285 (1907)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 205 U.S. 279, click here.
Ballentyne v. Smith No. 216 Argued March 21, 1907 Decided April 8, 1907 205 U.S. 285
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII
Syllabus
The old English rule that, in chancery sales, until confirmation of the master’s report, the bidding could be opened upon a mere offer to advance the price ten percent has been rejected, and a sale will not be set aside for inadequacy of price unless so great as to shock the conscience or where there are additional circumstances against its fairness, and each case stands upon its own facts.
While the confidence in the stability of judicial sales should not be disturbed, a sale under foreclosure of valuable property, worth at least seven times the amount of the bid, should not be confirmed in the face of an adverse report by the master and the trial court.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii, 17 Haw. 96, affirming an order of the third judge of the First Circuit Court in the Territory of Hawaii, which refused to confirm a sale of property made by a commissioner under order of court in a foreclosure suit brought by William O. Smith, as trustee, against the Pacific Heights Electric Railway Company, Limited, a Hawaiian corporation, and directed that the property be again offered for sale. The suit was brought to foreclose a trust deed of $50,000 executed by the railway company to Smith, as trustee, on April 1, 1902, and purporting to convey an electric railway two and one-half miles in length and running up to Pacific Heights, with its equipment of every kind, and also all land and other property conveyed to it by deed from one Charles S. Desky, dated January 25, 1902.
The sale was made on February 4, 1905, for the sum of $1,100. It was in bulk of the entire property covered by the mortgage, except a cable and condenser, which were of comparatively little value, and which, for reasons not at all affecting the merits of this controversy, were not sold with the balance of the property. The commissioner who made the sale reported that the amount realized was disproportionate to the value of the property sold, and recommended that it should not be confirmed, but that such further order should be made as to the court should seem meet in the premises. On the hearing of a motion to confirm the sale, and objections thereto, the trial court found that the evidence was overwhelming that the actual value of the property was at least seven times the amount at which the property was struck off, that being the highest and best bid therefor.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ballentyne v. Smith, 205 U.S. 285 (1907) in 205 U.S. 285 205 U.S. 286–205 U.S. 289. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6KXZAVYEZ7SBAXR.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ballentyne v. Smith, 205 U.S. 285 (1907), in 205 U.S. 285, pp. 205 U.S. 286–205 U.S. 289. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6KXZAVYEZ7SBAXR.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ballentyne v. Smith, 205 U.S. 285 (1907). cited in 1907, 205 U.S. 285, pp.205 U.S. 286–205 U.S. 289. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6KXZAVYEZ7SBAXR.
|